Important Issues
Behavioral Health
Learn MoreWomen's Health
Learn MoreOpioid Policy
Learn MoreHealth Equity
Learn MorePhysician Practice
Learn MoreChair Henderson Introduced Certificate of Need Reform Bill
On Tuesday, Councilmember Christina Henderson with Councilmembers Lewis George, Bonds, Allen, and Parker introduced B25-948, the Certificate of Need Improvement Amendment Act of 2024. The bill is scheduled for a hearing on October 9.
The bill is a long awaited attempt to reform a process that increasingly is forcing independent practices to spend hours and money complying with government requests when making even routine staffing or facility changes.
MSDC is encouraging everyone to testify either during the hearing or in writing after the hearing. To learn more, contact Robert Hay or see the FAQ and talking points document below.
Comparison Between MSDC Amendments to Certificate of Need Statute and B25
The bill would do the following, according to the Council:
1. Exempt Telehealth: The District is an outlier in its enforcement of the CON process, which was created to regulate the geographic distribution of brick-and-mortar health care services, for virtual provider networks and virtual telehealth platforms.
The bill instead requires DC Health to create a registration process for these entities.
2. Exempt office-based primary care and specialist practices: Only 2 other states regulate primary care facilities under CON (NJ, KY) and only 2 other
states regulate specialist practices with no operating rooms (VA, GA, KY). This would align the District with other states and encourage more primary and specialist care services to locate in the District.
3. Require biennial updates to
the capital thresholds: SHPDA currently has the authority to update the capital expenditure thresholds that would trigger a CON review on an annual basis, but this does not regularly occur. This bill would
require SHPDA to update the thresholds every 2 years to accurately reflect inflation and other economic indicators.
4. Exclude nonpatient care capital projects: Currently, health care facilities must submit for
CON review for capital projects not related to patient care, such as installing new elevators, garage improvements, and HVAC upgrades. These reviews can delay necessary repairs and
upgrades and create unnecessary costs. This bill proposes exempting these types of nonpatient care projects.
5. More flexible project timeline: Currently, SHPDA imposes a uniform deadline
of 3 years for CON approved capital projects. Facilities have had to restart the process when an active project is taking longer than expected. This bill proposes a more flexible approach to extend the timeline if the applicant is making good faith
efforts to meet the schedule.
6. Define “Group practice”: Although the term “group practice” is used in the current D.C. Code, it is not a defined term, which has led to confusion about when a new health care facility
must apply for a CON. This bill seeks to clearly define that term.
7. Adjust threshold for number of beds: Currently, SHPDA requires any facility changing its licensed bed capacity to obtain a CON if the change is by at least 10 beds or
10% of total beds, whichever is less. This bill proposes increasing the threshold to 10 beds or 20% of total beds, to avoid small facilities going through a lengthy CON process
for small changes to their operations.