Physician Voices for Patient Safety
On this page:
About the bill
Impact on patients in DC
Impact of physicians in DC
What can you do?
Resources
About the bill
In November 2023, DC Health introduced B25-545, the Health Occupations
Revisions General Amendment Act of 2023. This bill was a comprehensive
rewrite of the law overseeing medical licensing and regulation in
Washington, DC. Unfortunately, the bill as written overhauled
scope of practice, place allied health professionals in oversight
positions of medical licensing, and remove the physician from the center
of the care team. After much work and a number of legislative wins, the bill passed the Council on May 7.
MSDC has long advocated that a physician is the most qualified professional at the head of a care team. Physicians have the most health education and pre-practice experience of any health professional, and thus must be involved in all but the most mundane health care decisions. Allied health professionals are a valuable part of the care team, but their medical education and experience limits their role.
The Medical Society of the District of Columbia (MSDC) is the leading voice for physicians in Washington, DC, committed to uniting physicians to advocate for physician-led health care in Washington, DC that protects patients from harm and increases access to quality care. MSDC is leading a coalition of Washington, DC specialty medical societies to advocate against the Health Occupations Revisions General Amendment Act of 2023.
Impact on DC medicine
Below is a breakdown of some of the major changes the bill contains; click on the title to expand how the bill would change that item.
Currently the Board of Medicine is composed of 10 physicians and 4 members of the public. The bill as amended would reduce the number of physicians to 9 and adds 2 physician assistants but keep
the four members of the public health.
The concern: The bill would codify that APRNs could independently diagnose, prescribe, and administer medicine.
The details: See the analysis from G2L Law Firm on the APRN provisions | See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council
The solutions: Independent Advanced Certified Nurse Practitioners should have a defined scope of practice limited to the following functions:
- Practice only in the field of certification;
- Comprehensive physical assessment of patients;
- Certify to the clerk of the court that an adult has given birth;
- Certify to the Transportation authority that an individual has special needs for certain health reasons;
- Complete date of birth and medical information on a birth certificate;
- Complete a death certificate if medical examiner does not take charge and deceased was under the care of the PN;
- Establish medical diagnosis of common short-term and chronic stable health problems;
- File a replacement death certificate;
- Issue a “do not resuscitate order” in medical emergencies;
- Order, perform, and interpret laboratory and diagnostic tests;Prescribe drugs and devices under DC controlled substance Schedules II-V with a valid DEA license, and medical marijuana under DC laws;
- Provide emergency care within the scope of their skills;
- Refer patients to appropriate licensed physicians or other health care providers;
- Certify to utility company that a client has a serious illness or the need for life-support equipment;
- Witness an advanced directive;
- Sign off on home health/care orders.
The concern: As seen below, additional allied health professions are permitted to apply anesthesia. Most concerning is the scope expansion that could permit nurse anesthetists to practice without physician collaboration.
The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council
The solution: This bill asks to repeal Section 603 of DC official code ₰3-1206.03, and this action will allow nurse anesthetists to administer anesthesia without an anesthesiologist or other physician's direct collaboration. Language seeking repeal of Section 603 of DC official code ₰3-1206.03 should not be included.
This bill adds Sec. 605a, which contains language that a CRNA may plan and deliver anesthesia, pain management, and related care to patients or clients of all health complexities across the lifespan. Language adding Sec. 605a should be removed from this bill.
The expands audiologists' scope to include "cerumen management" and "interoperative neurophysiologic monitoring" and permits audiologists to screen for cognitive, depression and vision.
The bill completely rewrites the definition of the practice of "chiropractic". Chiropractors could:
- Diagnose and treat biomechanical or physiological conditions that compromise neural integrity or organ system function
- Refer patients for further medical treatment or diagnostic testing
The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council
The bill would expand pharmacists' scope to include:
- Ordering labs
- Scheduling and monitoring drug therapy
- Ordering, interpreting, and performing more tests
The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council
The bill would permit physical therapists to independently evaluate and treat disability, injury, or disease. PTs may also order imaging as part of their treatment plan.
The concern: The bill expands podiatrists scope of practice to allow:
- apply anesthesia as part of treatment; and
- administer vaccines and injections.
The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council
Throughout the bill, restrictions on nursing scope of practice are removed or loosened throughout. Specific language outlining what and how nurses can practice is removed and replaced with more vague language giving the Mayor (read DC Health)
the ability to dictate scope. This applies to many different nursing types, like APRNs and NPs.
Articles on scope of practice
Advocacy Curriculum: Looking Back on 2021 Year in Advocacy
(You can see a video summary of this article as part of Advocacy Committee Chair Dr. Klint Peebles' webinar, seen here).
To say 2021 in policy was unprecedented is not an exaggeration. At a minimum, we saw a budget process delayed until almost the fall, which never happens in DC politics. That alone is a good analogy for how unusual this year was in politics and policy. Despite the unusual nature of the year, MSDC and the physician community have a lot to celebrate about this calendar year.
To recap, 2021 is the first year of the 24th DC Council session. Each session is two years, so bills not passed or withdrawn by December 31 are still able to be considered in 2022. Usually that means the volume of regular order legislation considered is less than even-numbered years. Further complicating the legislative process is the continued COVID pandemic. The Council continues to conduct business virtually - with staff and members finally going back to the Wilson Building a little late this year - and this has impacted the legislative and regulatory processes.
The MSDC advocacy agenda saw some early wins from the Council. Three bills with MSDC support were enacted this year:
- B24-0020/L24-0025, the Flavored Tobacco Product Prohibition Amendment Act of 2021. The law prohibits the sale of tobacco to minors under the age of 16 and prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco products without an exemption.
- B24-0143/A 24-0202, Certified Midwife Credential Amendment Act of 2021. The act regulates the licensure and registration of certified midwives by the Board of Nursing.
- B24-0399, Preserve Our Healthcare Workforce Emergency Amendment Act. The legislation extended the temporary license to practice medicine established by the public health emergency declaration.
In addition, B24-0557, the Copay Accumulator Amendment Act, was introduced by Councilmember Mary Cheh and four co-introducers this month. The bill, a top MSDC priority and one crafted by MSDC members, requires insurers to apply discounts, financial assistant, and other reductions of out-of-pocket expenses when calculating prescription coinsurance or copayments. This bill is important as some insurers are applying prescription discounts to copayments, meaning patients are now paying more for prescriptions especially for specialty drugs.
During the Council budget process this year, MSDC saw two priorities receive funding that will improve the health of the District for years. The first is a one-time increase in federal funds for the Health Professionals Loan Repayment Program (HPLRP). The program, a strategic priority for MSDC, allows the District government to fund loan reimbursement for more health professionals working in underserved areas in the District. The second item funded was legislation funding postpartum care in Medicaid for 12 months after birth, a major priority for MSDC, ACOG, and the pediatric community.
The pandemic has shown that the borders between Maryland, Virginia, and DC are irrelevant when it comes to public health and the physician community's constant push for regional licensure took a big step forward this year. As we shared last week, the DC Board of Medicine voted to deem Maryland and Virginia's physician licensure requirements "substantially equivalent" to DC's, opening to door to more license reciprocity. This action could allow Maryland and Virginia physicians in the near future to have an expedited license approval process, something much needed in DC.
On the legal front, MSDC's partnership with the AMA Litigation Center continues to be a source of medical victories. MSDC joined the Litigation Center in a successful amicus brief for the federal case on the Biden Administration's eviction moratorium this summer. The amicus laid out public health reasons for extending the moratorium, and the language was involved in the decision. MSDC is equally optimistic for a positive outcome on two other amicus briefs filed on behalf of the District's minor consent for vaccinations law. This amicus, filed with the AMA and other health groups, defends the legislation in two cases filed by parents arguing the law is unconstitutional.
These successes are built on the hard work and advocacy of physicians throughout the year. Despite being busier than ever, physicians took time out of their schedules to testify at Council hearings and meet with members of the Council and Bowser Administration. These first-hand stories impacted the way bills were discussed and pushed forward the physician advocacy agenda. For example, Dr. Alice Fuisz gave important, practical testimony on a bill that would put onerous record-keeping requirements on physician practices. Her stories of how her office followed best practice but would be overwhelmed by the bill's requirements made an impact on the Committee on Health.
Finally, MSDC launched its new Advocacy Curriculum to help physicians learn how to better advocate for their patients and keep up to date on advocacy information. The curriculum included live events and written articles (like this one) to help physicians and medical students feel confident participating in advocacy activities. The live events including townhalls on major policy topics and meetings with three Councilmembers.
Next year promises to be a very busy one for the physician advocacy agenda, but 2021 helped build a foundation for success in 2022.